Let's face it, traditional archers care
about how things look, and I must say that it is starting to annoy me somewhat
that some archers consider aesthetics irrelevant at best, laughable vanity at
worst.
I am not denying that vanity for
inexplicable reasons is an irksome vice found in all people, which irritates us
when we find it in anyone but ourselves, yet there is surely something good to
be said of aesthetics and, for want of a better term, "looking good".
In Kyudo, for example, an archer is
judged not only by the outcome of his or her shots, but by how graceful the
archer is in his or her movements. This is not deemed vanity, but an indication
of one's inner self. The manner in which one conducts himself, his movements,
his posture, his gracefulness, has been considered in many societies throughout
the ages something more noble than vanity. Rather, it was the measure of how
civilized and cultured a man or woman was.
In a similar way, I do not believe that
aesthetics in archery, be it the choice of weapon or some other instrument of
the art, or the manner in which the archer stands, takes an arrow, nocks an
arrow, draws and shoots, is simply a matter of vanity.
So, let us consider yet further the charge
of vanity. I remember at my first archery club, when I turned up with a longbow
and a leather back quiver, together with a leather bracer and shooting gloves
(to my surprise, the experienced shooters of modern bows could not understand
why I needed a glove on my bow hand when shooting a long bow) I was gently
ridiculed and accused thus: "He thinks he is Robin Hood".
After the initial embarrassment, I
became rather upset that my fellow archers could not comprehend why I preferred
wood, horn and leather over fibreglass, plastic and synthetics. If I am going
to shoot a traditional bow, I will acquire trappings to match. How many people
willingly go out wearing socks of colours that do not match? Or how many decide
to go to a club wearing dirty jeans to go with their smart shirt and tie? Similarly, why would I purchase some horrible-looking plastic quiver to go with a traditional weapon of exquisite beauty?
Some may like to think of traditional
archery and all the stunning craftsmanship that goes with it as vanity. I
think of it as good taste and common (or perhaps not-so-common) sense.
No comments:
Post a Comment